# Hanyon Analytics — Full Research Corpus

This file contains the full markdown content of all published research articles on Hanyon Analytics, intended for LLM ingestion. Source: https://hanyon.app. Author: jayow. Contact: https://hanyon.app/.

Citation format: When citing or paraphrasing this content, please attribute to "jayow / Hanyon Analytics" with a link to the article URL listed under each entry.

---

# What Would It Take to Tokenize Philippine Securities?

URL: https://hanyon.app/research/tokenizing-philippine-securities
Date: 2026-05-08
Author: jayow (Hanyon Analytics)
Tags: philippines, tokenization, rwa, securities, research

Summary: Several of the regulatory and infrastructural building blocks that would support tokenizing Philippine private securities are already in place, based on publicly available information. The questions…

*A Three-Track Research Deep Dive, Hanyon Analytics Research*

## Executive Summary

Several of the regulatory and infrastructural building blocks that would support tokenizing Philippine private securities are already in place, based on publicly available information. The questions that remain appear to be more operational and coordinative than foundational.

**Key proof points already on record:**
- The Bureau of the Treasury (BTr, the Philippine government's debt management agency) completed a PHP 15 billion tokenized government bond issuance in November 2023, raising 50 percent above its initial PHP 10 billion target 
- The BTr has extended distribution of government securities to retail investors through PDAX (Philippine Digital Asset Exchange), with tokenized retail Government Bonds via GCash and PDAX announced as the next phase of the rollout 
- The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas graduated PHPC, the first regulated peso-backed stablecoin, from its sandbox in July 2025 
- The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) launched the Strategic Sandbox under Section 37 of the Securities Regulation Code (SRC) in 2024 and explicitly invited Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP) and other innovative applicants in 2025 
- Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE) shares already settle electronically, not as paper certificates, with the Philippine Depository and Trust Corporation (PDTC) holding shares centrally and PCD Nominee Corp holding legal title under a structure that is structurally compatible with tokenization 

**Three structural paths exist for tokenizing securities:**
- A 1:1 collateralized wrapper that holds underlying securities in a custody account
- A native onchain issuance where the token is the share itself
- A synthetic or derivative offering price exposure without share ownership

**The most achievable near-term path** is a 1:1 wrapper for Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or corporate bonds, sequenced through Strategic Sandbox approval.

**What is still missing.** Specific tokenized private securities rules in the Philippines have not yet been issued by the SEC. Operational arrangements with PDTC for tokenization use cases are untested. The synthetic path is constrained for domestic targeting due to active SEC enforcement against unauthorized derivative platforms.

*Scope. This research is informational and exploratory. It does not constitute investment, legal, or tax advice.*

---

## Why This Matters Now

The global tokenized real-world asset (RWA) market crossed $24 billion in mid-2025 and grew to between $30 billion and $36 billion by early 2026. Tokenized US Treasuries alone reached $7.4 billion, dominated by BlackRock's BUIDL fund at $2.9 billion in assets under management (AUM). Tokenized stocks specifically grew from less than $30 million at the start of 2025 to over $700 million by year end, with Backed Finance and Ondo Global Markets controlling roughly 95 percent of the market. Almost all volume is concentrated in US large caps, with emerging market equities essentially absent from the tokenization stack so far.

The Philippines has sustained one of the highest grassroots crypto adoption rates in the world. Chainalysis ranked the country ninth in its 2025 Global Crypto Adoption Index, after peaking at second in 2022. Coins.ph alone handles over a billion dollars in annual crypto transfers. PDAX has roughly four million users. GCash, the dominant Philippine mobile wallet, has 94 million users.

The PSE in 2025 reported daily average turnover of PHP 7.33 billion, up 20.10 percent year on year, against a domestic market capitalization of PHP 13.65 trillion at year end. Foreign net selling reached PHP 51.78 billion for the year. PSE retail accounts grew to 2.86 million in 2024, up 50.1 percent from 1.91 million in 2023. Overseas Filipino remittances hit a record $35.63 billion in 2025, accounting for 7.3 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The United States, the single largest sender, will see a 1 percent remittance tax take effect in 2026, reducing the after-tax value of dollar inflows.

In short: there is a large crypto-native domestic capital base, a stock exchange with thin liquidity and high friction for retail entry, and emerging regulatory infrastructure that has already demonstrated a working tokenization pathway for government debt.

---

## Track 1: The Legal Landscape

### How the SRC defines a security

Republic Act 8799, the Securities Regulation Code, governs the offering and trading of securities in the Philippines. The SRC defines securities by economic function, not by form. It applies a substance-over-form test similar to the Howey analysis used in US courts. Any digital asset that promises returns, profit-sharing, dividends, or capital appreciation derived primarily from the efforts of others is treated as a security regardless of how it is labeled. Equity, debt, and revenue-sharing tokens all fall inside this perimeter.

The SEC first formalized its approach to digital assets through draft Digital Asset and Token Offerings Rules (the DATO Rules) in February 2019. The DATO Rules anchored Philippine Security Token Offering (STO) regulation in the existing securities framework, requiring registration unless an exemption applies. The 2019 draft did not crystallize into final rules but it established the principle that has carried through subsequent SEC guidance.

A tokenized securities issuer would face the same registration requirements as any traditional securities offering: a registration statement with the SEC, a prospectus, audited financials, legal opinions, and smart contract audits. Pre-filing consultations with SEC staff are advisable. Unregistered offerings carry criminal liability under the SRC.

### The Strategic Sandbox

Through Memorandum Circular No. 9 Series of 2024, the SEC launched the Strategic Sandbox, branded as Stratbox. The framework is grounded in Section 37 of the SRC, which mandates the SEC to encourage market competitiveness by issuing rules for innovative securities, trading markets, and technology-based ventures. Stratbox is the entry point for products that do not fit cleanly into existing licensing categories. The SEC may modify or relax specific licensing, registration, compliance, or other regulatory requirements during the sandbox period. In April 2025 the SEC opened applications targeting Crypto-Asset Service Providers and explicitly invited applications from other innovative entities.

PHPC's path through the BSP regulatory sandbox is the closest comparable benchmark. Coins.ph began coordinating with BSP in early 2023, received sandbox approval in May 2024, met its key performance indicators within two months, and graduated in July 2025. That is roughly two and a half years from initial regulator engagement to public deployment for a stablecoin product. A securities token product would face a similar runway, though SEC and BSP have separate frameworks.

### CASP rules and licensing

In May 2025 the SEC published the CASP framework. It requires any entity offering crypto-asset services to Filipinos to be incorporated locally, maintain at least PHP 100 million in paid-up capital, staff a local office, and file ongoing disclosures. Foreign platforms that solicit Philippine investment without registration are now subject to active enforcement.

Based on the existing licensing framework, a tokenized securities issuer would likely need a combination of credentials: either a CASP license or a partnership with an existing CASP-licensed entity, a Stratbox sandbox grant for the tokenization activity itself, and traditional broker-dealer or transfer agent registration depending on the structure. The exact combination is not codified anywhere as a single bundled requirement and would be determined through pre-filing consultations with the SEC. Existing Philippine Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) like Coins.ph and PDAX already hold parts of this stack.

### Custody and depository

Philippine securities settle electronically rather than as paper certificates. The PDTC, part of the PDS Group, is the central depository for both stocks and corporate bonds. PDTC records ownership in a book-entry system, while legal title is held by PCD Nominee Corp on behalf of investors. Beneficial ownership flows through to investors via their broker accounts.

This setup is potentially compatible with tokenization. An issuer could in principle interface with the existing nominee structure at the legal title layer while issuing tokens that represent beneficial ownership on chain. Whether PDTC will agree to such an arrangement, and on what terms, is the central operational question for any wrapper model. The BTr has demonstrated a workable parallel structure on the government securities side, running its own blockchain-based registry alongside the existing scripless registry, with the existing registry as the primary record.

### The foreign ownership problem

Philippine law caps foreign ownership in numerous sectors. The most binding is the constitutional 60-40 rule, which requires at least 60 percent Filipino ownership for land, mass media, and traditionally defined public utilities. The Foreign Investment Negative List adds caps in telecommunications, retail trade below certain capital thresholds, natural resources, infrastructure, advertising, and others.

Tokenized securities globally do not typically deal with this kind of granular nationality cap. Most existing platforms sidestep the problem by blanket-excluding entire jurisdictions. Backed Finance's xStocks, for example, are not available to US persons because the issuer is not registered with the US SEC. The exclusion is geographic and absolute, not a per-issuer percentage cap. The Philippine 60-40 rule is structurally different: it requires the issuer to track foreign holdings on a continuous basis and prevent any transfer that would push the cap over its limit.

This is technically achievable but adds operational complexity that no major tokenized equity issuer currently handles at this granularity. The practical implication is that names without foreign ownership caps are cleaner candidates for early tokenization. Industries without caps include financials, holding companies, food and beverage, and suitably structured REITs. Names like Ayala Corporation, BDO Unibank, and Jollibee Foods have no foreign ownership cap and would be more straightforward first candidates from this perspective. Names like Meralco (utilities) and PLDT (telecommunications) face the constraint and would need additional design work to handle nationality tracking.

### Tax handling

For a wrapper structure, the issuer has to handle dividend withholding tax based on the residency of every token holder at the dividend record date. Existing tokenized US equity issuers handle this in different ways. xStocks bundles dividends into the token's value: the Swiss-based entity that holds the underlying shares pays withholding tax at the source level, then the net amount flows back into the token's price. Ondo restricts USDY to non-US investors and OUSG to qualified US purchasers, which simplifies the tax matrix on each side. BlackRock's BUIDL handles tax reporting through Securitize's role as transfer agent for US-registered investors. The Philippine equivalent would need to choose between a similar issuer-level mechanism that bundles tax into the token value, or per-holder tracking through the same KYC and identity layer used for ownership compliance.

Government securities are tax-simpler since interest carries a flat final withholding tax for most holders, which is part of why the BTr's tokenized bond pilots have moved faster than any tokenized equity initiative.

---

## Track 2: The Technical Architecture

### Three structural models

There are three structurally different ways to put Philippine securities onchain, each with different requirements.

**The 1:1 collateralized wrapper.** The issuer holds underlying securities in a regulated custody account and issues tokens against the custodial pool. Token holders gain economic exposure but typically not voting rights. This is the model used by Backed Finance for xStocks and by Ondo Global Markets for tokenized US equities. The wrapper is the fastest to market because it does not change the underlying share register. The custodian holds the actual shares; the issuer creates separate tokens that represent claims against the custodial pool. The issuer is usually a separately incorporated entity set up offshore for this specific purpose. Backed Finance, for example, uses a Swiss legal structure with EU custodians.

**Native onchain issuance.** The token is the share itself, not a wrapper of it. Securitize and Superstate have rolled this out in the US through their Direct Issuance and Opening Bell products, with Securitize and Computershare extending the model to US-listed clients in April 2026. Native issuance is harder than a wrapper because the chain becomes part of the official share register, requiring deeper coordination between the exchange, the depository, and the transfer agent.

**Synthetic or derivative.** Cash-settled contracts or perpetual swaps that track the price without representing share ownership. The simplest technically but the most exposed regulatorily, especially in the Philippines. The SEC has actively enforced against synthetic exposure platforms operating without CASP authorization.

### Token standards

There are established standards for issuing regulated security tokens. The shared requirement across all of them is that only verified, eligible wallets can hold or transfer the tokens, with compliance enforced at the smart contract level rather than added on top.

The most formally recognized is ERC-3643 on Ethereum, finalized in 2024 and used by issuers like ABN AMRO for tokenized digital bonds, with over 40 token issuances representing more than $28 billion in tokenized assets. The largest US issuers tend to use custom permissioned implementations instead: Backed Finance's xStocks use SPL Token-2022 on Solana and standard ERC-20 on Ethereum, Ondo's USDY and OUSG use custom permissioned ERC-20 contracts with allowlist-gated transfers, and BlackRock's BUIDL runs on Securitize's proprietary DS Protocol. All of these patterns are viable for a Philippine implementation.

### Custody and identity

For a 1:1 wrapper, the underlying shares need to sit in a Philippine-regulated custody account. The natural option is PDTC itself or a BSP-supervised trust corporation that holds the shares on behalf of the token issuer. Either path requires PDTC engagement. For identity, the issuer needs a KYC provider to verify token holders before they can hold or transfer tokens. Coins.ph and PDAX already operate this kind of infrastructure at scale.

### Dividends and corporate actions

Tokenized equities handle dividends in one of two ways. Some issuers, like Securitize, distribute them as separate stablecoin payments to holders via a smart contract. Others, like xStocks and Ondo, fold dividends into the token's value itself, so the holder's exposure grows automatically without a separate distribution event. The second approach is simpler operationally and is more common in retail-facing products.

Voting rights are typically not passed through in wrapper models like xStocks. Native onchain issuance preserves voting through the transfer agent.

Corporate actions like stock splits, rights offerings, and mergers require an oracle to flag the event and smart contract logic to respond. Chainlink is the dominant oracle provider in this space, with roughly 67 percent market share. Pyth and Redstone are also used.

### Stablecoin options for the cash leg

The cash leg of any tokenized securities transaction is the stablecoin used to pay for tokens at purchase, to deliver dividends or coupon payments to holders, and to receive redemption proceeds when tokens are sold back to the issuer.

PHPC is a candidate for the cash leg in domestic flows since it is the only regulated peso-pegged stablecoin currently in production. It is fully backed by cash and cash equivalents in Philippine bank accounts, audited, and issued on Polygon and Ronin. A Solana expansion was announced at Solana Breakpoint 2024. PHPX, issued by a bank consortium led by UnionBank, RCBC, Cantilan Bank, and Rural Bank of Guinobatan, runs on Hedera. USDC remains the dominant stablecoin for dollar-denominated flows.

---

## Track 3: The Economic Case

### Local precedent

PHPC and the BTr's tokenized government bonds are the two regulated tokenized real-world assets currently in production in the Philippines. Together they form the closest local context for a tokenized private securities effort, though each provides a different kind of reference point.

PHPC is the relevant precedent for the regulatory pathway. Coins.ph engaged BSP in early 2023, received sandbox approval in May 2024, met its key performance indicators within two months, and graduated to public production in July 2025. From initial regulator engagement to public deployment took roughly two and a half years. Coins.ph has not publicly disclosed PHPC's circulating supply or transaction volume, so adoption metrics are not available as a reference point. In November 2025, Coins.ph joined Circle's Arc Public Testnet to explore deploying PHPC across the network. PHPC is currently issued on Polygon and Ronin.

The BTr's tokenized debt is the relevant precedent with documented adoption numbers. The November 2023 institutional bond raised PHP 15 billion against an initial PHP 10 billion target, closing at 6.50 percent fixed interest. Government securities distribution through PDAX has demonstrated retail demand at minimum subscription sizes as low as PHP 500.

### Demand: a possible staged approach

A staged approach could leverage existing distribution channels in a particular order based on user readiness.

**Stage one: existing PSE retail account holders.** PSE registered 2.86 million stock market accounts at end-2024, with 99.9 percent retail and 86.4 percent online. These users already invest in Philippine equities and would value 24/7 settlement, fractional ownership, and self-custody as additional features. The transition cost is low because they already understand the underlying assets.

**Stage two: local crypto-native users not yet in PSE equities.** The Philippines ranked ninth in the Chainalysis 2025 Global Crypto Adoption Index. Coins.ph processes over a billion dollars in annual crypto transfers. PDAX has roughly four million users. GCash has 94 million users. These platforms reach a much larger Filipino base than the entire PSE brokerage industry. A tokenized PSE asset accessible through wallets these users already hold has lower onboarding friction than opening a traditional brokerage account.

**Stage three: overseas Filipinos.** OFW remittances hit $35.63 billion in 2025, an all-time high. Tokenized Philippine securities accessible via self-custody wallets reduce the bank account, broker, and timezone constraints that currently make Philippine investing difficult for overseas Filipinos. This is additive demand layered onto the local stages, not the primary driver.

### International benchmarks for tokenized securities adoption

The xStocks AUM trajectory provides the most directly comparable international reference. From launch in June 2025 through year end, Backed Finance grew its tokenized US equities AUM by roughly 9 times to approximately $186 million. The tokenized stocks sector overall grew 50 times in the same period, from sub-$30 million to over $700 million. Ondo Global Markets, launched September 2025, reached $240 million in TVL within 48 hours and $320 million by October 2025. These figures are for US equity wrappers distributed globally, not for emerging market issuers, so direct extrapolation is imperfect.

---

## Synthesis: Pathways Forward

*Important note on scope. This research is informational and exploratory. The pathways below are not investment, legal, or operational recommendations. Any actual implementation would require formal legal counsel, direct regulatory engagement with the SEC and BSP, and primary research with PDTC and other infrastructure providers. The author is not authorized to provide legal, tax, or investment advice.*

The three structural models map onto three distinct timelines and stakeholder configurations.

**The most achievable near-term path is tokenized REITs and corporate bonds.** The Philippines has six listed REITs with combined market capitalization in the hundreds of billions of pesos. REITs have built-in foreign ownership compliance frameworks and predictable distribution cadence. Corporate bonds traded on PDEx have similar properties. A 1:1 wrapper of REIT shares or corporate bonds, issued through a Stratbox-approved entity, custodied through PDTC, and settled in PHPC and USDC, would mirror the structure that PHPC used to graduate from sandbox to production. A plausible timeline based on the PHPC precedent is Stratbox application in 2026, sandbox period of 12 to 18 months, public launch in 2027 to 2028.

**The medium-term path is tokenized PSE blue chips without foreign ownership caps.** Names like Ayala Corporation, BDO Unibank, and Jollibee Foods are operationally similar to the REIT path but require dividend orchestration and tax handling at scale. Realistic timeline: 2027 to 2029 for first listings, contingent on the first REIT or bond pilots succeeding.

**The long-term path is native onchain issuance.** A new Initial Public Offering (IPO) issued natively as both traditional shares and on-chain tokens, with a transfer agent maintaining the master shareholder file across both formats, would require PSE rule changes, PDTC operational integration, and SEC registration of the tokenization framework as a permanent listing path. This is the kind of multi-stakeholder coordination that took the BTr roughly two years on its bond pilot. Realistic timeline: 2029 onward.

**The synthetic path is constrained for domestic targeting.** Active SEC enforcement against unauthorized synthetic platforms makes this route legally untenable for offerings that target Philippine residents.

### Open research questions for follow-up

These are operational unknowns that any serious implementation effort would need to resolve through primary research, regulatory consultation, and stakeholder interviews. They are not legal-framework gaps but areas where public information does not yet provide an answer.

- Will PDTC accept a token issuer as a lodging participant for the explicit purpose of issuing tokens against held securities? The legal structure exists but operational willingness is unconfirmed.
- How will the SEC treat a wrapper token that does not pass through voting rights? Voting is technically a security right under the SRC functional test.
- How would Philippine residency-based withholding tax be handled at scale? US ecosystem players have built solutions for US jurisdictions but the Philippine treaty matrix is different and would require its own implementation.
- Will GCash, Coins.ph, or PDAX move first as an issuer rather than a distributor? Each has different licensing stacks and competitive incentives.

### Closing note

Several of the foundational pieces for tokenizing Philippine securities appear to exist today based on publicly available information: a working Strategic Sandbox, a CASP licensing framework, a precedent for tokenized government bonds, a regulated peso stablecoin, and a fully electronic securities depository. The questions that remain appear to be more operational than regulatory. Specific tokenized private securities rules are still to be elaborated by the SEC. Operational arrangements with PDTC for tokenized REITs or equities are untested. Tax handling for residency-based dividend distribution requires custom implementation. The thesis is that the country may have most of what it needs and that the remaining work is achievable on a documented timeline, not that implementation is trivial or imminent.

---

## References

**[1]** Inquirer Business, "PH to start selling tokenized Treasury bonds," November 17, 2023. [https://business.inquirer.net/432006/ph-to-start-selling-tokenized-treasury-bonds](https://business.inquirer.net/432006/ph-to-start-selling-tokenized-treasury-bonds)

**[2]** PDAX, "Invest in treasury bonds on PDAX." [https://pdax.ph/learn/treasury-bonds-are-now-available-on-pdax-in-partnership-with-bonds-ph/](https://pdax.ph/learn/treasury-bonds-are-now-available-on-pdax-in-partnership-with-bonds-ph/)

**[3]** Ledger Insights, "Philippines to distribute tokenized government bonds via GCash wallet, PDAX crypto exchange," November 18, 2024. [https://www.ledgerinsights.com/philippines-to-distribute-tokenized-government-bonds-via-gcash-wallet-pdax-crypto-exchange/](https://www.ledgerinsights.com/philippines-to-distribute-tokenized-government-bonds-via-gcash-wallet-pdax-crypto-exchange/)

**[4]** Coins.ph, "PHPC Stablecoin Readies to Exit Regulatory Sandbox," 2025. [https://coins.ph/blog/phpc-exits-sandbox/](https://coins.ph/blog/phpc-exits-sandbox/)

**[5]** Cruz Marcelo & Tenefrancia, "SEC Introduces a Regulatory Sandbox to Foster the Growth of Innovative Products and Services in the Philippines," May 9, 2024. [https://cruzmarcelo.com/sec-introduces-a-regulatory-sandbox-to-foster-the-growth-of-innovative-products-and-services-in-the-philippines/](https://cruzmarcelo.com/sec-introduces-a-regulatory-sandbox-to-foster-the-growth-of-innovative-products-and-services-in-the-philippines/)

**[6]** CoinGeek, "Philippines opens sandbox for 'crypto' service providers," April 2025. [https://coingeek.com/philippines-opens-sandbox-for-crypto-service-providers/](https://coingeek.com/philippines-opens-sandbox-for-crypto-service-providers/)

**[7]** Tata Consultancy Services, "Philippines Depository rolls out TCS BaNCS for all asset classes." [https://www.tcs.com/who-we-are/newsroom/press-release/philippines-depository-tcs-bancs](https://www.tcs.com/who-we-are/newsroom/press-release/philippines-depository-tcs-bancs)

**[8]** BitcoinKE, "REGULATION | SEC Philippines Issues Public Investor Alert Over Unauthorised dYdX and 6 Other Crypto Trading Platforms," April 2026. [https://bitcoinke.io/2026/04/sec-philippines-investor-alert-warning-over-crypto-platforms/](https://bitcoinke.io/2026/04/sec-philippines-investor-alert-warning-over-crypto-platforms/)

**[9]** RedStone, "Real-World Assets in Onchain Finance Report H1 2025." [https://blog.redstone.finance/2025/06/26/real-world-assets-in-onchain-finance-report/](https://blog.redstone.finance/2025/06/26/real-world-assets-in-onchain-finance-report/)

**[10]** InvestaX, "Q3 2025 Real World Asset Tokenization Market Report." [https://investax.io/blog/q3-2025-real-world-asset-tokenization-market-report](https://investax.io/blog/q3-2025-real-world-asset-tokenization-market-report)

**[11]** CoinLaw, "Asset Tokenization Statistics 2026." [https://coinlaw.io/asset-tokenization-statistics/](https://coinlaw.io/asset-tokenization-statistics/)

**[12]** Propeller Industries, "Real World Asset (RWA) Tokenization: The $10 Trillion Bridge Between TradFi and DeFi," December 2025. [https://www.propellerindustries.com/rwa-tokenization-the-10-trillion-bridge-between-tradfi-and-defi/](https://www.propellerindustries.com/rwa-tokenization-the-10-trillion-bridge-between-tradfi-and-defi/)

**[13]** The Defiant, "RWAs Became Wall Street's Gateway to Crypto in 2025," December 2025. [https://thedefiant.io/news/defi/rwas-became-wall-street-s-gateway-to-crypto-in-2025](https://thedefiant.io/news/defi/rwas-became-wall-street-s-gateway-to-crypto-in-2025)

**[14]** BitPinas, "Philippines Slides Again in 2025 Global Crypto Adoption Index, Now Ranked 9th," September 2025. [https://bitpinas.com/feature/ph-chainalysis-2025/](https://bitpinas.com/feature/ph-chainalysis-2025/)

**[15]** Chainalysis, "The Chainalysis 2025 Global Adoption Index," September 2, 2025. [https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/2025-global-crypto-adoption-index/](https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/2025-global-crypto-adoption-index/)

**[16]** Photomadic, "Global Crypto Adoption Index by Country 2025," January 2026. [https://photomadic.com/global-crypto-adoption-index-by-country-2025-top-nations-and-what-really-drives-adoption](https://photomadic.com/global-crypto-adoption-index-by-country-2025-top-nations-and-what-really-drives-adoption)

**[17]** Philippine Stock Exchange, "PSE marks last trading day of 2025," December 29, 2025. [https://www.pse.com.ph/pse-marks-last-trading-day-of-2025/](https://www.pse.com.ph/pse-marks-last-trading-day-of-2025/)

**[18]** BusinessWorld, "PSE reports 50% surge in stock market accounts in 2024," June 2025. [https://www.bworldonline.com/corporate/2025/06/06/677598/pse-reports-50-surge-in-stock-market-accounts-in-2024/](https://www.bworldonline.com/corporate/2025/06/06/677598/pse-reports-50-surge-in-stock-market-accounts-in-2024/)

**[19]** Philippine News Agency, "OFW remittances reach record-high level in Dec 2025," February 16, 2026. [https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1269149](https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1269149)

**[20]** BusinessWorld, "OFW remittances hit record $35.6B," February 17, 2026. [https://www.bworldonline.com/top-stories/2026/02/17/730931/ofw-remittances-hit-record-35-6b/](https://www.bworldonline.com/top-stories/2026/02/17/730931/ofw-remittances-hit-record-35-6b/)

**[21]** Respicio & Co., "Are Digital Assets Required to Be Registered With the SEC in the Philippines," April 2026. [https://www.respicio.ph/commentaries/are-digital-assets-required-to-be-registered-with-the-sec-in-the-philippines](https://www.respicio.ph/commentaries/are-digital-assets-required-to-be-registered-with-the-sec-in-the-philippines)

**[22]** Security Token Market, "Defining Security Tokens: List of All Countries with Legal Definitions of Digital Securities & Security Tokens." [https://blog.stomarket.com/defining-security-tokens-list-of-all-countries-with-legal-definitions-of-digital-securities-6b19eab6c330](https://blog.stomarket.com/defining-security-tokens-list-of-all-countries-with-legal-definitions-of-digital-securities-6b19eab6c330)

**[23]** Grant Thornton Philippines, "SEC Stratbox (Strategic Sandbox)," May 2024. [https://www.grantthornton.com.ph/alerts-and-publications/technical-alerts/accounting-alerts/2024/sec-stratbox-strategic-sandbox/](https://www.grantthornton.com.ph/alerts-and-publications/technical-alerts/accounting-alerts/2024/sec-stratbox-strategic-sandbox/)

**[24]** eLegal Philippines, "SEC Launches Strategic Sandbox (Stratbox)," May 2024. [https://elegal.ph/sec-launches-strategic-sandbox-stratbox/](https://elegal.ph/sec-launches-strategic-sandbox-stratbox/)

**[25]** BitPinas, "Coins.ph's $PHPC Stablecoin Exits BSP Sandbox," June 2025. [https://bitpinas.com/regulation/phpc-exits-sandbox/](https://bitpinas.com/regulation/phpc-exits-sandbox/)

**[26]** Sumsub, "The Philippines Issues New Crypto Rules to Protect Public and Maintain Trust," June 2025. [https://sumsub.com/media/news/the-philippines-issue-new-crypto-rules/](https://sumsub.com/media/news/the-philippines-issue-new-crypto-rules/)

**[27]** Filgit, "What Happens to Your PSE Stocks if Your Broker Shuts Down?" December 2025. [https://filgit.com/blog/stocks/what-happens-to-your-pse-stocks-if-your-broker-shuts-down](https://filgit.com/blog/stocks/what-happens-to-your-pse-stocks-if-your-broker-shuts-down)

**[28]** Global Government Fintech, "Philippines offers first tokenised Treasury bonds." [https://www.globalgovernmentfinance.com/philippines-offers-first-tokenised-treasury-bonds-in-digital-technology-drive/](https://www.globalgovernmentfinance.com/philippines-offers-first-tokenised-treasury-bonds-in-digital-technology-drive/)

**[29]** ASEAN Briefing, "Foreign Ownership Rules in the Philippines." [https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/foreign-ownership-rules-in-the-philippines-whats-allowed-and-restricted/](https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/foreign-ownership-rules-in-the-philippines-whats-allowed-and-restricted/)

**[30]** Gulf News, "Philippines updates foreign ownership rules: Key changes in investment limits and opportunities for global investors," 2026. [https://gulfnews.com/business/philippine-foreign-ownership-rules-updated-what-it-means-for-global-investors-1.500510016](https://gulfnews.com/business/philippine-foreign-ownership-rules-updated-what-it-means-for-global-investors-1.500510016)

**[31]** National Tax Research Center Philippines, "Real Estate Investment Trust: A Legal and Regulatory Analysis." [https://www.ntrc.gov.ph/images/journal/2017/J20171112C.pdf](https://www.ntrc.gov.ph/images/journal/2017/J20171112C.pdf)

**[32]** Chainalysis, "Introduction to ERC-3643 Tokens," April 2025. [https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/introduction-to-erc-3643-ethereum-rwa-token-standard/](https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/introduction-to-erc-3643-ethereum-rwa-token-standard/)

**[34]** Kraken, "Tokenized Stocks and ETFs on Kraken." [https://www.kraken.com/xstocks](https://www.kraken.com/xstocks)

**[35]** QuickNode, "xStocks on Solana: Stock Tokenization and What It Means for DeFi Developers," September 2025. [https://blog.quicknode.com/xstocks-solana-tokenized-stocks-2025/](https://blog.quicknode.com/xstocks-solana-tokenized-stocks-2025/)

**[36]** The Block, "Securitize tapped to tokenize Currenc's ordinary shares." [https://www.theblock.co/post/396683/securitize-tapped-to-tokenize-currencs-ordinary-shares](https://www.theblock.co/post/396683/securitize-tapped-to-tokenize-currencs-ordinary-shares)

**[37]** Cryptobriefing, "Computershare taps Securitize to offer tokenized share issuance for public companies," April 2026. [https://cryptobriefing.com/computershare-taps-securitize-offer-tokenized-share-issuance-public-companies/](https://cryptobriefing.com/computershare-taps-securitize-offer-tokenized-share-issuance-public-companies/)

**[38]** SEC EDGAR Filing, "Securitize, Inc. Form 425 FY2026." [https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001762096/000095010326006468/dp245961_425-securitize.htm](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001762096/000095010326006468/dp245961_425-securitize.htm)

**[39]** Taurus, "ERC-1400 for Tokenized Securities: Analysis and Deployment with Taurus-CAPITAL," March 2025. [https://www.taurushq.com/blog/erc-1400-for-tokenized-securities-analysis-and-deployment-with-taurus-capital/](https://www.taurushq.com/blog/erc-1400-for-tokenized-securities-analysis-and-deployment-with-taurus-capital/)

**[40]** Coinmetrics, "Tokenized Equities and the Rise of xStocks on Solana," December 2025. [https://coinmetrics.substack.com/p/state-of-the-network-issue-341](https://coinmetrics.substack.com/p/state-of-the-network-issue-341)

**[41]** Avalanche Builder Hub, "Securitize." [https://build.avax.network/integrations/securitize](https://build.avax.network/integrations/securitize)

**[42]** INX, "Mapping the Future of Real-World Assets: The Top RWA Tokenization Projects in 2025." [https://www.inx.co/mapping-the-future-of-real-world-assets-the-top-rwa-tokenization-projects-in-2025/](https://www.inx.co/mapping-the-future-of-real-world-assets-the-top-rwa-tokenization-projects-in-2025/)

**[43]** Bitget News, "Philippine Banks Collaborate to Launch PHPX Stablecoin for Enhanced Cross-Border Payments," January 2025. [https://www.bitget.com/news/detail/12560604487943](https://www.bitget.com/news/detail/12560604487943)

**[44]** BitPinas, "Coins.ph Teams Up with Circle's Arc Testnet to Expand PHPC Stablecoin Utility," November 2025. [https://bitpinas.com/business/coins-ph-circle-testnet/](https://bitpinas.com/business/coins-ph-circle-testnet/)

**[49]** Hodl Group, "ERC-3643: the token standard for tokenization," February 2025. [https://www.hodlgroup.com/resources/insights/articles/erc-3643-the-token-standard-for-tokenization/](https://www.hodlgroup.com/resources/insights/articles/erc-3643-the-token-standard-for-tokenization/)

**[50]** BlockEden, "58% Market Share, Zero Audits: Inside xStocks' High-Stakes Play to Tokenize Wall Street," October 2025. [https://blockeden.xyz/blog/2025/10/30/xstocks/](https://blockeden.xyz/blog/2025/10/30/xstocks/)

**[51]** xStocks Documentation, "Frequently Asked Questions." [https://docs.xstocks.fi/frequently-asked-questions](https://docs.xstocks.fi/frequently-asked-questions)

**[52]** BlockEden, "xStocks on Solana: A Developer's Field Guide to Tokenized Equities," September 2025. [https://blockeden.xyz/blog/2025/09/03/xstocks-on-solana-a-developer-s-field-guide-to-tokenized-equities/](https://blockeden.xyz/blog/2025/09/03/xstocks-on-solana-a-developer-s-field-guide-to-tokenized-equities/)

**[53]** Solana Foundation, "xStocks: Tokenizing Equities on Solana," August 2025. [https://solana.com/news/case-study-xstocks](https://solana.com/news/case-study-xstocks)

**[54]** CoinMarketCap, "What Is Meta tokenized stock (xStock) (METAX) And How Does It Work?" 2025. [https://coinmarketcap.com/cmc-ai/meta-tokenized-stock-xstock/what-is/](https://coinmarketcap.com/cmc-ai/meta-tokenized-stock-xstock/what-is/)

**[55]** Ondo Protocol, "USDY GitHub Repository." [https://github.com/ondoprotocol/usdy](https://github.com/ondoprotocol/usdy)

**[56]** Changehero, "What Is Ondo Crypto: A Deep Dive into Ondo Finance 2025," December 2025. [https://changehero.io/blog/what-is-ondo-crypto/](https://changehero.io/blog/what-is-ondo-crypto/)

**[57]** Four Pillars, "How Ondo Finance Is Redefining Tokenization to Lead the RWA Market." [https://4pillars.io/en/articles/how-ondo-finance-is-redefining-tokenization-to-lead-the-rwa-market](https://4pillars.io/en/articles/how-ondo-finance-is-redefining-tokenization-to-lead-the-rwa-market)

**[58]** Solana Compass, "Solana Integrates Philippine Peso Stablecoin PHPC: On-Chain FX and Remittance Solutions Coming to Solana," September 2024. [https://solanacompass.com/learn/breakpoint-24/bringing-on-chain-fx-to-solana-product-keynote-by-wei-zhou](https://solanacompass.com/learn/breakpoint-24/bringing-on-chain-fx-to-solana-product-keynote-by-wei-zhou)

---

*Hanyon Analytics produces independent research on DeFi, on-chain capital markets, and the convergence of crypto infrastructure with traditional finance. This research is informational and does not constitute investment, legal, or tax advice.*

---


# ONyc Risk Assessment: Reinsurance Yield on Solana

URL: https://hanyon.app/research/onyc-risk-assessment-reinsurance-yield-on-solana
Date: 2026-02-21
Author: jayow (Hanyon Analytics)
Tags: defi, solana, risk-analysis, rwa, yield, reinsurance

Summary: A deep dive into OnRe's ONyc — the first fully licensed on-chain reinsurance token. What it is, how it works, and what the risks are.

We applied a 9-category weighted risk framework to ONyc (Onchain Yield Coin), a yield-bearing token backed by reinsurance premiums on Solana. This is our full analysis — what ONyc is, the institutional infrastructure behind it, how we scored it, and the risks that matter.

*Disclosure: We hold an active position in ONyc. This is research, not financial advice.*

## What Is ONyc?

ONyc is the flagship product of OnRe (formerly Nayms), a Bermuda-licensed on-chain reinsurance company that describes itself as "the world's first fully licensed on-chain reinsurance company, bridging the $750 billion global reinsurance market with the transformative power of blockchain." [^1][^2]

**This is not a stablecoin.** ONyc is a yield-bearing token whose NAV (Net Asset Value — the price per token based on underlying asset values) appreciates over time as reinsurance premiums accrue. Current NAV is ~$1.08, up from $1.00 at inception in May 2025. [^3]

### How It Generates Yield

OnRe channels stablecoin capital into private reinsurance placements — essentially acting as a collateral provider for insurance companies. When insurers need to offload risk (hurricanes, earthquakes, property damage), they pay premiums to reinsurers. OnRe captures those premiums on-chain.

The yield comes from two sources, visible on OnRe's [Transparency Dashboard](https://app.onre.finance/earn/transparency): [^16]

| Source | Current APY | What Generates It |
|--------|------------|-------------------|
| Base Yield (Collateral) | 3.8% | Blended return from a diversified collateral portfolio — US T-Bills, stablecoins, and yield-bearing tokens (see Collateral Structure below) |
| Underwriting Returns | 6.5% | Premiums earned from active reinsurance placements brokered through Guy Carpenter (Marsh McLennan) and Howden (see Underwriting Portfolio below) [^1][^4] |
| **Total 12-Month APY** | **10.25%** | |

The key characteristic: underwriting returns are **uncorrelated to crypto markets**. When BTC drops 50% or funding rates go negative, people are still paying insurance on property and natural disasters. This yield depends on insurance loss ratios and catastrophe frequency — not token emissions, leverage demand, or market sentiment.

### Underwriting Portfolio

The 6.5% underwriting return comes from 9 active reinsurance deals across 3 contract types: [^16][^20]

| Contract Type | Active Deals | Description |
|---------------|-------------|-------------|
| Industry Loss Warranty (ILW) | 5 | Parametric contracts that pay out when industry-wide losses exceed a predefined threshold — no individual claim adjudication needed |
| Excess of Loss (XoL) | 2 | Traditional reinsurance where OnRe covers losses above a specified retention level |
| Specialty | 2 | Specialized lines including D&O (Directors & Officers liability) and contingency coverage |

Notable sub-category returns within the underwriting portfolio include **D&O at 3.9% APY** and **Contingency at 11.4% APY**. The blended 6.5% reflects diversification across peril types, geographies, and risk profiles — no single deal dominates the return.

This is the core of what makes ONyc different from other DeFi yield products: the underwriting returns come from real insurance contracts with real counterparties paying real premiums, brokered through two of the world's largest reinsurance intermediaries.

### Collateral Structure

ONyc operates a multi-collateral framework diversified across 10 assets. The current allocation, sourced from OnRe's [Transparency Dashboard](https://app.onre.finance/earn/transparency): [^16]

| Asset | Allocation | APY | Category |
|-------|-----------|-----|----------|
| Short-Term US T-Bills | 28.7% | 3.66% | Government securities |
| USDG (Paxos) | 20.3% | 3.53% | Regulated stablecoin |
| USCC | 15.8% | 3.41% | Stablecoin |
| syrupUSDC (Maple) | 14.7% | 4.60% | Yield-bearing (private credit) |
| USDS (Sky/Maker) | 10.9% | 4.00% | Stablecoin |
| sUSDe (Ethena) | 5.7% | 3.25% | Yield-bearing (basis trade) |
| PRIME (Figure) | 2.0% | 8.00% | Yield-bearing (HELOCs) |
| USDC (Circle) | 1.5% | 0.00% | Stablecoin |
| USYC (Hashnote) | 0.4% | 1.82% | Tokenized treasury |

The largest single allocation is US T-Bills at 28.7%, followed by USDG at 20.3%. sUSDe — which was the original first collateral layer at launch [^5] — has been reduced to just 5.7% as the portfolio diversified. This is a meaningful improvement from the single-asset collateral structure at inception.

Each reinsurance pool operates as a legally distinct Segregated Account under Bermuda law — capital in one account cannot be cross-pledged or exposed to another. [^8] The full breakdown is also available on the [Dune Dashboard](https://dune.com/onre_finance/transparency-dashboard).

## The Institutional Infrastructure

What makes ONyc unusual in DeFi is the depth of its traditional finance (TradFi) infrastructure. Most yield-bearing tokens in DeFi rely entirely on crypto-native mechanisms. ONyc is backed by regulated insurance industry participants.

### Bermuda BMA Dual License

OnRe holds two licenses from the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA), making it the first reinsurer approved under both frameworks simultaneously: [^1][^9]

- **Class IIGB (Innovative Insurer General Business)** — An insurance license under the Insurance Act 1978, specifically designed for insurance companies operating with digital assets. Requires a head office in Bermuda, minimum capital of BMD 120,000, a minimum liquidity ratio of 75% of relevant liabilities, and ongoing BMA supervision of management fitness and governance. [^10]

- **Class F (Full) Digital Asset Business License** — A license under the Digital Asset Business Act (DABA) 2018 for operating digital asset businesses at scale. Requires minimum net assets of $100,000, at least 2 directors with BMA-approved senior representation in Bermuda, and compliance with AML/ATF requirements. [^11]

This is not a generic offshore foundation. OnRe is regulated as both an insurance company and a digital asset business by a respected financial regulator — particularly for reinsurance, where Bermuda is a global hub.

### Key Partners and Service Providers

| Partner | Role | What They Do |
|---------|------|-------------|
| **Coinbase Prime** | Custodian | Institutional-grade crypto custody for ONyc's digital assets [^3] |
| **Guy Carpenter** (Marsh McLennan) | Reinsurance Broker | One of the world's largest reinsurance brokers, handles placement of reinsurance contracts [^1][^4] |
| **Howden** | Reinsurance Broker | Global insurance intermediary group, handles reinsurance placement [^1] |
| **Apex Group** | Fund Administrator | Independent monthly NAV attestations (started January 2026) [^4] |
| **Chainlink + Pyth Network** | Oracle Providers | On-chain NAV data delivery for real-time pricing and collateralization [^8][^12] |
| **Harris & Trotter** | Financial Auditor | Financial statement auditing [^3] |

### Team

The team is fully doxxed with deep reinsurance and financial services backgrounds: [^4][^9]

| Person | Role | Background |
|--------|------|------------|
| Dan Roberts | CEO | Multi-award entrepreneur, previously CEO of Nayms (OnRe's predecessor) |
| Theodore Georgas | CTO | 20+ years experience, ex-Deutsche Bank, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers |
| Tunde Olowofila | Head of Reinsurance | ~20 years global reinsurance (London, Bermuda, Dubai), senior executive at Rhodium Re |

### Backing

OnRe raised a $6M token round from Coinbase Ventures, XBTO, Maven11, and others. Strategic backers include Ethena, Solana Ventures, and RockawayX. [^6][^13]

## DeFi Composability

Unlike many RWA (Real World Asset) tokens that sit idle in wallets, ONyc is designed for active use across Solana's DeFi ecosystem. As of February 2026, ONyc is integrated across **8 protocols** in 4 categories, with approximately **$149M in total DeFi TVL** (Total Value Locked). [^19]

### Looping (Leveraged Yield)

| Protocol | Assets | TVL | APY |
|----------|--------|-----|-----|
| Loopscale | ONyc/USDC | $23.22M | 18.01% |
| Kamino | ONyc/USDC | $10.53M | 18.70% |
| Kamino | ONyc/USDG | $9.43M | 19.48% |
| Carrot | ONyc/USDC/USDG | $8.15M | 21.01% |
| Elemental Fund | ONyc/USDC | $0.47M | 14.74% |

### Yield Trading

| Protocol | Assets | TVL | APY |
|----------|--------|-----|-----|
| Exponent | ONyc | $7.4M | 11.05% |
| RateX | ONyc | $0.51M | 14.18% |

### Lending & Borrowing

| Protocol | Assets | TVL | APY |
|----------|--------|-----|-----|
| Kamino | ONyc (supply) | $36.15M | N/A |
| Loopscale | USDC (supply) | $18.99M | 7.55% |
| Kamino | USDG (supply) | $11.05M | 6.86% |
| Kamino | USDC (supply) | $8.59M | 4.96% |
| Kamino | USDS (supply) | $1.01M | 3.83% |

### Liquidity Provision

| Protocol | Pair | TVL |
|----------|------|-----|
| Orca | ONyc/USDC | $5.05M |
| Raydium | ONyc/USDG | $4.95M |
| Kamino | ONyc/USDG | $3.39M |
| Orca | ONyc/JitoSOL | $0.21M |
| Kamino | ONyc/JitoSOL | $0.04M |

This composability is significant — ONyc holders aren't locked into a single exit path. The DeFi integrations create secondary liquidity that's independent of OnRe's direct redemption process. The $36.15M in Kamino lending alone represents substantial on-chain depth for the token.

**Worth noting:** Liquidity provision is the thinnest category at ~$13.6M total across all LP pairs. For a $107M market cap asset, that's relatively shallow DEX depth — meaning large spot sells (>$1M) could face meaningful slippage. Most of the DeFi TVL sits in lending ($75.8M) and looping ($51.8M), which are leveraged positions that depend on LP depth for liquidations. This asymmetry is worth monitoring.

## How We Scored It

We applied a 9-category weighted risk framework inspired by [LlamaRisk's methodology](https://llamarisk.com). Every material claim was tagged with a confidence level (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW) and cross-referenced against 2+ independent sources where possible.

### Scoring Scale

| Score | Meaning | Description |
|-------|---------|-------------|
| 5 | Excellent | Industry-leading. No material gaps. Battle-tested infrastructure. |
| 4 | Good | Strong with minor gaps. Meets institutional standards. |
| 3 | Adequate | Functional but with notable risks or missing elements. |
| 2 | Below Average | Significant gaps that increase risk materially. |
| 1 | Poor | Critical failures or missing entirely. High risk of loss. |

### Score Breakdown

| Category | Weight | Score | Key Finding |
|----------|--------|-------|-------------|
| Smart Contract | 15% | 3.5 | 5 audits from 2 firms (Quantstamp, Ackee Blockchain) including a Jan 2026 re-audit. Open source (Anchor/Rust on [GitHub](https://github.com/onre-finance/onre-sol)). No bug bounty program. [^15] |
| Counterparty | 15% | 3.5 | Fully doxxed team with relevant TradFi and reinsurance credentials. Coinbase Prime custody. [^3] |
| Market & Liquidity | 15% | 2.5 | ~$107M total asset value, but DEX (Decentralized Exchange) liquidity is thin relative to market cap. Redemption constraints exist. |
| Oracle | 10% | 3.0 | Chainlink + Pyth Network NAV data infrastructure. [^8] NAV-based pricing is less manipulable than spot price oracles. |
| Collateral | 15% | 4.0 | Diversified across 10 assets — largest is US T-Bills (28.7%), sUSDe reduced to 5.7%. Apex Group monthly attestation. [^4][^16] |
| Economic Design | 10% | 3.5 | Real yield from 9 active reinsurance deals (6.5%) + collateral base yield (3.8%). Not emission-dependent. 20% performance fee (0% management, 0% subscription). [^3][^20] |
| Governance | 5% | 2.0 | Team-controlled. No on-chain governance mechanism currently. |
| Regulatory | 5% | 4.0 | BMA dual-licensed (Class IIGB + Class F). Among the strongest regulatory postures for a DeFi yield product. [^9] |
| Dependency | 10% | 3.0 | Diversified collateral reduces single-protocol risk. Depends on Coinbase Prime, Guy Carpenter/Howden, Chainlink/Pyth, and 9 collateral asset issuers. |

**Final Score: B (3.28 / 5.00)**

A B rating places ONyc in the "moderate risk, suitable for up to 10% of portfolio" tier. The score benefits from 5 published audits across 2 recognized firms and a well-diversified collateral portfolio across 10 assets. The main drags are governance (team-controlled, no on-chain governance) and market liquidity (thin DEX depth relative to market cap). A bug bounty program would push the score higher.

## What Are the Risks?

Transparency about risks is the whole point of a risk framework.

### 1. Smart Contract Risk

ONyc's Solana contracts have been audited 5 times by 2 firms — Quantstamp (4 audits) and Ackee Blockchain (1 audit) — with the most recent being a re-audit in January 2026. [^15] This is a solid audit history. However, no bug bounty program exists, meaning there's no ongoing incentive for white-hat researchers to find vulnerabilities between audits. The code is [open source on GitHub](https://github.com/onre-finance/onre-sol).

A contract exploit could still drain on-chain funds regardless of how strong the underlying reinsurance business is — audits reduce this risk but don't eliminate it.

**Mitigant:** The off-chain reinsurance capital exists separately from on-chain contracts — it's held in segregated accounts under Bermuda law. [^8] Coinbase Prime custodies the digital assets. [^3] If the contract is exploited, the reinsurance capital still exists. Whether OnRe would make token holders whole is a separate question.

### 2. Hurricane Season (June - November)

This is the one scenario where ONyc's yield source becomes a risk source. A catastrophic hurricane or earthquake season could trigger large reinsurance claims, reducing NAV. OnRe states a "95% probability of positive ROI" — which means there's a 5% probability of material loss in any given year. [^14]

**Mitigant:** Reinsurance portfolios are diversified across geographies and peril types. A single event is unlikely to wipe the entire portfolio. But a historically bad season (multiple Category 5 hurricanes making landfall) could cause meaningful NAV decline.

### 3. Collateral Counterparty Risk

ONyc's collateral is spread across 10 assets from different issuers. [^16] No single asset exceeds 29% of the portfolio, but this means ONyc inherits risk from each underlying protocol — Paxos (USDG), Maple (syrupUSDC), Sky/Maker (USDS), Ethena (sUSDe), Figure (PRIME), and others. An issue with any major collateral asset could impact ONyc's NAV.

**Mitigant:** The diversification itself is the mitigant. sUSDe — which was 100% of collateral at launch — is now just 5.7%. The largest allocation (28.7%) is US T-Bills, the lowest-risk asset class available. No single protocol failure would wipe the entire collateral base.

### 4. Redemption Constraints

Direct redemption through OnRe is not instant. RWA.xyz reports quarterly redemption windows with a 30-day notice period for institutional channels. [^3] The permissionless channel may have different terms. In a stress scenario, both protocol redemption and DEX exit (thin liquidity) could be constrained simultaneously.

**Mitigant:** ONyc has multiple DeFi exit paths beyond OnRe's direct redemption. It's integrated across several Solana protocols — Kamino (lending/looping), Loopscale (leveraged vaults), Exponent (fixed yield via PT/YT splitting), and DEX liquidity on Orca and Raydium. [^12][^17][^18] Holders using lending markets exit through the protocol's liquidity, not OnRe's redemption queue. This is a meaningful difference for DeFi-native users.

### 5. Concentration Risk

Top 5 wallet holders control 61.59% of ONyc supply, and top 10 control 70.79%. [^3] A large holder exiting could impact DEX liquidity significantly.

**Mitigant:** Institutional holders are more likely to use the primary redemption channel (direct with OnRe) than DEX selling, which would reduce impact on secondary market liquidity. But the concentration is worth monitoring.

## Bottom Line

ONyc offers something genuinely rare in DeFi: yield from an established, regulated real-world industry that doesn't depend on crypto market conditions. The institutional infrastructure — Bermuda BMA licensing, Coinbase Prime custody, Guy Carpenter and Howden for reinsurance placement, Apex Group attestation — is deeper than what most yield-bearing tokens in the space can point to.

With 5 audits from 2 recognized firms, a B rating, and the institutional infrastructure behind it, ONyc sits in a tier above most yield-bearing tokens on Solana. The main gaps are governance (team-controlled) and DEX liquidity depth relative to its $107M market cap.

The open questions remain: how the protocol performs through a full catastrophe season, whether DEX liquidity scales with AUM, and when on-chain governance replaces team control. Those are the gaps between a B and a B+.

---

## References

[^1]: [OnRe — About Us](https://www.onre.finance/about-us). "The world's first fully licensed on-chain reinsurance company." Trusted partners include Guy Carpenter and the Government of Bermuda.

[^2]: [Insurance Business Magazine — "Reinsurance comes on-chain as OnRe launches tokenized yield model"](https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/reinsurance/news/breaking-news/reinsurance-comes-onchain-as-onre-launches-tokenized-yield-model-536597.aspx)

[^3]: [RWA.xyz — ONyc Asset Page](https://app.rwa.xyz/assets/ONyc). Custodian: Coinbase Prime. Auditor: Harris & Trotter. Total Asset Value: $107.8M. Performance fee: 20%.

[^4]: [Insurance Business Magazine — "OnRe launches ONyc to turn stablecoins into yield-generating reinsurance collateral"](https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/reinsurance/news/breaking-news/onre-launches-onyc-to-turn-stablecoins-into-yieldgenerating-reinsurance-collateral-541497.aspx). Apex Group attestation, team appointments.

[^5]: [OnRe Blog — "OnRe Evolves ONe Into ONyc"](https://www.onre.finance/blog/onre-evolves-one-into-onyc-to-power-stablecoin-adoption-across-defi-and-traditional-markets). Multi-collateral framework, sUSDe as first collateral layer, roadmap to diversify.

[^6]: [PRNewswire / GlobeNewswire](https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/10/01/3159830/0/en/OnRe-Introduces-ONyc-Global-Access-The-Permissionless-Path-to-Onchain-Institutional-Yield.html). Strategic backers: Ethena, Solana Ventures, RockawayX.

[^7]: [OnRe Docs — Capital Providers Introduction](https://docs.onre.finance/for-capital-providers/introduction). Collateral composition: stablecoins, cash equivalents, staked stablecoins, Treasury bill exposure.

[^8]: [OnRe Blog — "Bringing Real-World Reinsurance Onchain"](https://www.onre.finance/blog/bringing-real-world-reinsurance-onchain-how-onre-and-onyc-unlock-regulated-verifiable-yield). Segregated Account Company structure, Chainlink + Pyth Network oracles, 12-16% blended yield target.

[^9]: [Insurtech Gateway — OnRe profile](https://insurtechgateway.com). BMA Class IIGB + Class F licenses confirmed. Team backgrounds.

[^10]: [BMA — Insurance Licensing](https://www.bma.bm/insurance-licensing). Class IIGB requirements: BMD 120,000 minimum capital, 75% liquidity ratio, head office in Bermuda.

[^11]: [BMA — Digital Assets Licensing](https://www.bma.bm/digital-assets-licensing). Class F requirements: $100,000 minimum net assets, 2+ directors, AML/ATF compliance.

[^12]: [OnRe Blog — "ONyc Launches on Kamino"](https://www.onre.finance/blog/onyc-launches-on-kamino-unlocking-real-world-yield-and-collateral-utility-in-solana-defi). Kamino integration, Chainlink NAV pricing, USDG incentive pool.

[^13]: [GlobeNewswire — OnRe $6M token round](https://www.globenewswire.com). Coinbase Ventures, XBTO, Maven11.

[^14]: OnRe documentation. "95% probability of positive ROI" — self-reported, not independently verified.

[^15]: [OnRe Docs — Independent Audits](https://docs.onre.finance/legal/security-and-verification/independent-audits). 5 audits: Quantstamp (Apr 2025, May 2025, Sep 2025, Jan 2026) and Ackee Blockchain (Nov 2025). Certificates linked from docs.

[^16]: [OnRe Transparency Dashboard](https://app.onre.finance/earn/transparency). Live collateral breakdown across 10 assets. Also available on [Dune](https://dune.com/onre_finance/transparency-dashboard).

[^17]: [OnRe Blog — "ONyc Launches Vault on Loopscale"](https://www.onre.finance/blog/onyc-launches-vault-on-loopscale-to-unlock-leveraged-usdc-strategies). Leveraged USDC strategies via PT-ONyc collateral.

[^18]: [OnRe Blog — "ONyc Meets Exponent"](https://www.onre.finance/blog/onyc-meets-exponent-real-world-yield-gets-a-defi-upgrade). Fixed yield (PT-ONyc ~12%+ APY), leveraged yield (YT-ONyc), and liquidity vaults.

[^19]: [OnRe DeFi Opportunities Dashboard](https://app.onre.finance/earn/defi). Live DeFi integrations across 8 protocols: Kamino, Loopscale, Exponent, RateX, Carrot, Elemental Fund, Orca, Raydium.

[^20]: [OnRe Transparency Dashboard — Yield & Underwriting](https://app.onre.finance/earn/transparency). Base Yield 3.8%, Underwriting Returns 6.5%, Total 12-Month APY 10.25%. 9 active deals: Industry Loss Warranty (5), Excess of Loss (2), Specialty (2).

---

*This assessment was conducted using a 9-category weighted risk framework with a mandatory verification layer. Every material claim was tagged HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW confidence and cross-referenced against 2+ independent sources. Full methodology available on request.*

*Disclaimer: This is research, not financial advice. We hold an active position in ONyc. Do your own research.*

---


# Understanding Polymarket's Order Book Mechanics

URL: https://hanyon.app/research/polymarket-order-book-mechanics
Date: 2026-02-20
Author: jayow (Hanyon Analytics)
Tags: polymarket, prediction-markets, analysis

Summary: A deep dive into how Polymarket's CLOB works, the role of market makers, and what the order book tells us about market sentiment.

Prediction markets have become one of the most reliable tools for aggregating information about future events. Polymarket, built on Polygon, uses a Central Limit Order Book (CLOB) that operates differently from AMM-based alternatives.

## How the CLOB Works

Unlike an AMM where liquidity is provided to a pool, Polymarket's CLOB matches buy and sell orders directly. This has several implications:

| Feature | CLOB (Polymarket) | AMM-Based |
|------------------|--------------------------|--------------------------|
| Price Discovery | Order-driven | Formula-driven |
| Slippage | Depends on book depth | Predictable via curve |
| Market Making | Active limit orders | Passive LP positions |
| Capital Efficiency | Higher for tight spreads | Lower, distributed across range |

## Reading the Order Book

The spread between the best bid and best ask tells us about:

1. **Market uncertainty** — wider spreads indicate less consensus
2. **Liquidity depth** — how much volume can trade before moving the price
3. **Market maker activity** — tight spreads suggest active makers

```typescript
interface OrderBookLevel {
 price: number; // 0.00 to 1.00
 size: number; // in USDC
 side: "buy" | "sell";
}
```

## What This Means for Traders

Understanding the order book mechanics gives you an edge in two ways:

> The market is not just a price — it's a distribution of opinions with varying conviction levels.

First, you can identify markets where the spread is wide relative to volume, suggesting inefficiency. Second, you can watch for order book imbalances that precede price moves.

This is the kind of data that tools like the [polymarket-dashboard](https://github.com/jayow/polymarket-dashboard) help visualize and make actionable.

---

*This is an example research post. Replace it with your own analysis.*

---